• Flattr FoI: 
Falkvinge &Co. on Infopolicy
BEFORE-FALKVINGE-IF-ANY FALKVINGE &CO. ON
INFOPOLICY
Falkvinge on Infopolicy - Home
»
Broken dictionary - CC photo by Flickr user eliajphilips

Down With (The Word) “Capitalism”

18

Activism – Zacqary Adam Xeper

Activism – Zacqary Adam Xeper

Capitalism. We keep saying that word. We don’t think it means what everyone else thinks it means. Whatever the word “capitalism” used to mean, it’s now been mutated into thought-preventing newspeak. Nobody can have a real discussion if we insist on using it.

“Capitalism” is one of those words where the dictionary definition has very little to do with how people actually use it in conversation. The word means many things depending on whom you ask, what the context of the discussion is, and something random like the current alignment of the planets or whatever. It can mean:

  • Something good about the status quo: The ability to start your own business. The free market (when it works). Competition leading to better ideas. Consumer choice. Choice of which job you want. All of the above, or just some of the above.
  • Something bad about the status quo: The private ownership of the means of production. Exploitation of workers. The free market (when it doesn’t work). Competition stifling good ideas. Plutocracy. Monopolies. Short-term profiteering at the expense of the environment. All or some of the above.
  • Something that isn’t the status quo: The free market. Smaller, decentralized businesses instead of giant corporations. Lack of plutocracy. Lack of monopolies. Distributed ownership of the means of production. A healthy labor market where you can choose a decent wage. All or some of the above.

It also helps to note the various things that “anti-capitalism” means:

  • Tyranny
  • Freedom
  • No freedom
  • Democracy
  • Lack of democracy
  • Having your home taken away from you
  • Not being in danger of having your home taken away from you
  • Being forced to work a pointless job that you hate
  • Not being forced to work a pointless job that you hate
  • Authoritarian centralized planning
  • Libertarian decentralized planning
  • Anarchy
  • Inherently statist, therefore not anarchy
  • Economically stagnant dystopia
  • Post-scarcity utopia
  • Living in the woods and eating bark and wearing fur
  • Explosive technological and scientific advancement freed from the demands of capital
  • Star Trek
  • Mad Max
  • Stalin
  • Gandhi
  • The free market (yes, really)

Unless you stay within a social circle where everyone agrees on the meaning of “capitalism” (which you probably won’t), asking the question “are you pro- or anti-capitalism?” makes about as much sense as “are you pro- or anti-histamine?” Except “anti-histamine” actually has a definition.

So, I beg of you, people of the world. If you’re pro-capitalist (whatever that means), please stop trying to convince people that the problem is “corporatism, not capitalism.” If you’re anti-capitalist (whatever that means), please stop trying to convince people that “capitalism is exploitation.” As soon as the word “capitalism” starts getting thrown around, everyone’s preconceived notion of what that word means takes over, and constructive debate becomes impossible. Psychologically, it’s as if either side is screaming at each other in completely different languages.

Obviously, I’m not going to force anyone to change the words they use. Only a capitalist and/or anti-capitalist would try to do something like that. But seriously. It’d be great if we could stop saying this word, and say what we mean instead.

You've read the whole article. Why not subscribe to the RSS flow using your favorite reader, or even have articles delivered by mail?

About The Author: Zacqary Adam Xeper

Zacqary is an activist in the New York Pirate Party, where his official title is "Cat Herder." He is an open source game developer, and the Chief Executive Plankhead of Plankhead, a free culture arts collective. Despite believing that money is a superfluous social construct, he has a Gittip profile.

Liked This?

TRANSLATIONS AVAILABLE
This article is also available in other languages: Italian.

By participating in the discussion and posting here, you are placing your contribution in the public domain (CC0). If you are quoting somebody else, credit them.

Contributors take own responsibility for their comments.

18

  1. 1
    TTime

    I stopped using the word Capitalism years ago. I felt that i didn’t understand the word, and whenever it was thrown into a discussion it seemed to bring out the fanatic in people. This blog post was really helpful. Thanks!

  2. 2
    Marko

    Insightful and very funny. Thanks.

  3. 4
    Buglord

    it’s a shame people are utterly unable to use words for what the words mean.. because that’s what I try to do. which means nobody ever understands what I am trying to say.

  4. 5
    Ian Farquhar

    That’s a good point.

    Capitalism is both an approbatory and a pejorative. It joins other terms like communism, fascism and socialism where the dictionary, political and historical definitions bear little or no relation to their general usage.

  5. 6

    It’s interesting, it’s the same with many other words that lost their meanings and yet people still use them. I’m thinking now the left/right “dichotomy” in politics (and I’m using it very loosely). Both bean essentially nothing anymore politically speaking and yet people throw them around trying to force the world to fit in their own black and white definitions while in reality the world is much more nuanced (I refuse to use ‘shades of gray’ and open this comment to a whole world of fun) or start throwing them around as if they are some sort of insult.

    What is clear to me is that the current system (one that we call Capitalism) is utterly broken. Just for saying that a whole lot of alienated morons (and I mean a huge chunk of the world) will start foaming and throwing such “insulting” words at me without even giving it some thought or listening to my ideas. I don’t believe Socialism works out of the book either. Nor anarchy would work at all for social beings (humans did organize in “Governments” since very early). What will work will be a new model that mixes a whole lot of concepts and add in new ones and humanity is trying to develop this model right now as Capitalism is slowly crumbling from the top of its unsustainability.

    We are seeing it all around us. Anonymous, Occupy, Bitcoins, Whistleblowing etc etc etc. And we are seeing the current powers running around scared, unable to understand or give the rings in order not to lose the fingers. I don’t know how things will end but I’m betting on collectivity over the previous egocentric approach. With blood on the path towards that end as we are already seeing it happening. We are in a second set of Dark Ages (Middle Ages).

    The sad part is that this new system will also be corrupted. Hopefully that new system is resilient enough to last more time with stability and allow a new cycle with less resistance.

  6. 7
    vince

    What else can we say instead of “capitalism”? I know a dude who says “voluntary exchange”, as in “I would like to live in a voluntary exchange society.” Are there some better alternatives?

  7. 8
    Anonymous

    I think that the same applies to socialism.

  8. 9
    pop

    Bravo.

    I call it socialism. More just to irritate capitalists/anti-capitalists really. I actually agree with anon. They’re all stupid labels.

    I also like Graeber’s line about capitalism being the worst possible means of organising communism.

  9. 10

    This is an elementary problem of General Semantics with an extremely simple solution: If you’re going to discuss abstract concepts such as societal models with people, define your f*cking terms before misunderstandings start flying all over the place.

    Discussions where two (or more) people are arguing about a propositional function, with each of them holding it as an entirely different proposition in their own minds due to using different (and undisclosed) definitions of some term(s) used, account for probably more than 95% of human arguments.
    People can have all kinds of opinions about a function like “x + y = 5″ or “communism is more economically efficient than capitalism”; they are not objectively correct or incorrect, but meaningless until given definitions.

    • 10.1
      donjoe

      Except the terms are already defined in the dictionary and I don’t consider myself under any obligation to provide special definitions when my intended use of a word doesn’t deviate significantly from the dictionary definition. It should be enough to say that everyone is simply expected to first learn the language they’re going to use to communicate. Then words will mean pretty much what the dictionary says they mean, every time a special definition is not put forth.

  10. 11
    kabunin

    Capitalism only means that the means of production is in the hands of private owners. But i guess this private ownership has expanded to include owning judges, politicians, scientists, economists and journalists as well.

    Market economy would be more democratic with worker owned companies instead of individual private monopolists and hierarchical undemocratic global corporations.

  11. 12
    shawn grover

    capitalism is just un-elected centralism
    socialism is elected centralism

    when i explain it in simple terms -people get it

    keep it simple and pure

  12. 13
    marketsnotcapitalism

    The book Markets Not Capitalism was a great resource that helped me come to a similar conclusion, though it could equally be applied to “socialism” and other vaguely defined, hyper-politicized “isms.” There’s a free PDF and audio book that you can easily find online, I highly recommend this book to anyone interested in the history and future of liberty.

  13. […] Other modern free marketers have noted the same thing.  And now, of course, there is a backlash against this backlash.  The suggestion of letting “capitalism” return to it’s original meaning, is rejected because(among other reasons), we shouldn’t let the definition of words change.  I shit you not: […]

  14. […] artículo que me pasó Pablo sobre los conceptos capitalismo y anticapitalismo me dejó con la intención de […]

Add a Comment

+ 2 = 6  

On Facebook

Popular Articles

PyramidCapital
25

Diversity – Zacqary Adam Xeper

Diversity – Zacqary Adam Xeper

Bitcoin concept
13

Cryptocurrency – Nozomi Hayase

Cryptocurrency – Nozomi Hayase

More in Activism

threwitontheground
17

Activism – Travis McCrea

Activism – Travis McCrea

cheerse
11

Activism – Travis McCrea

Activism – Travis McCrea

paypalevil
20

Activism – Travis McCrea

Activism – Travis McCrea

Border Patrol In Montana
25

Activism – Travis McCrea

Activism – Travis McCrea

tsa
18

Activism – Travis McCrea

Activism – Travis McCrea

email security
29

Activism – Andrew "K`Tetch" Norton

Activism – Andrew "K`Tetch" Norton

Other Recent Headlines

Screenshot from Librep-2014-08-10-take1.mp4
9

Civil Liberties

Civil Liberties

Librep July 12 frame
32

Civil Liberties

Civil Liberties

Money cut into pieces - Photo by Flickr user Tax Credits
78

Swarm Economy – Zacqary Adam Xeper

Swarm Economy – Zacqary Adam Xeper

colorblindflag
22

United States – Zacqary Adam Xeper

United States – Zacqary Adam Xeper

Adobe the leech - original photo by OakleyOriginals on Flickr
168

Swarm Economy – Zacqary Adam Xeper

Swarm Economy – Zacqary Adam Xeper

peter_sunde_0237
13

Swarm Economy – Lionel Dricot

Swarm Economy – Lionel Dricot

solarroad
16

Swarm Economy – Zacqary Adam Xeper

Swarm Economy – Zacqary Adam Xeper

European Parliament
70

Pirate Parties

Pirate Parties

About The Author

Zacqary is an activist in the New York Pirate Party, where his official title is "Cat Herder." He is an open source game developer, and the Chief Executive Plankhead of Plankhead, a free culture arts collective. Despite believing that money is a superfluous social construct, he has a Gittip profile.

More On Infopolicy

NSA Seal Holding the Heartbleed Logo
40

Infrastructure – Zacqary Adam Xeper

Infrastructure – Zacqary Adam Xeper

Bitcoin concept by Antanacoins. CC-By-SA, Flickr.
42

Cryptocurrency – Charlie Shrem

Cryptocurrency – Charlie Shrem

Bottles of Snake Oil - Photo by Jagrap on Flickr
29

Copyright Monopoly – Zacqary Adam Xeper

Copyright Monopoly – Zacqary Adam Xeper

facebook
12

Swarm Economy – Zacqary Adam Xeper

Swarm Economy – Zacqary Adam Xeper

523377_63619557
4

Infopolicy – Henrik Brändén

Infopolicy – Henrik Brändén

photo_10071_20090418-646x363
71

Copyright Monopoly – David Collier-Brown

Copyright Monopoly – David Collier-Brown

National_Security_Agency_headquarters,_Fort_Meade,_Maryland_public_domain_image
154

Infopolicy – Christian Engström

Infopolicy – Christian Engström

"God Hates Signs" next to "God Hates Fags" protesters
8

Freedom of Speech – Zacqary Adam Xeper

Freedom of Speech – Zacqary Adam Xeper

Many different currencies - CC photo by epSos.de
45

Diversity – Zacqary Adam Xeper

Diversity – Zacqary Adam Xeper

le_tresor_rackham_le_rouge_1280x1024
11

Copyright Monopoly – Lionel Dricot

Copyright Monopoly – Lionel Dricot

Valve mechanism
95

Freedom of Speech

Freedom of Speech

Books before copyright
99

Copyright Monopoly – Johnny Olsson

Copyright Monopoly – Johnny Olsson

Collaborative whiteboard at OuiShare 2012, full of wonderful ideas for venture capitalists to ruin - photo by Natalie Ortiz
15

Swarm Economy – Zacqary Adam Xeper

Swarm Economy – Zacqary Adam Xeper

Spices - Marrakech 09 Souks
58

Swarm Economy

Swarm Economy

This publication is protected under the Constitution of the Kingdom of Sweden. Any problem you have with this publication remains exclusively yours. Accountable publisher: Rick Falkvinge.
All text on this site is Public Domain / CC0 unless specifically noted and credited otherwise. Copy, remix, and inspire. (Troll policy.)
Log in | Original theme design by Gabfire themes (heavily modified)