• Flattr FoI: 
Falkvinge &Co. on Infopolicy
BEFORE-FALKVINGE-IF-ANY FALKVINGE &CO. ON
INFOPOLICY
Falkvinge on Infopolicy - Home
»
Arrest

“Everything You Say Can And Will Be Used Against You, By Anybody, Now Or Decades Into The Future.”

25

Freedom of Speech

Freedom of Speech

There are politicians trying to eliminate anonymity on the net. That’s a very, very dangerous game to play. Beside the fact that it will always be easily circumvented when people know they need to be anonymous, the danger lies in when people don’t think of that need.

Every day, we say things that we wouldn’t say in other contexts. We react to news with WTF-type blurts, we react to stupid politicians and greedy bankers with emotional statements.

These statements are all-too-frequently social glue rather than intended to be taken at face value. More importantly, they are transient — they disappear as soon as they are spoken or heard. Would you really be comfortable if everything, everything, you said was recorded, permanently archived, and made searchable?

That’s where these politicians would have us.

It’s the equivalent of a police arrest in the United States, where you are told — very seriously – that “Everything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law“. What happens? Well, most people take the hint and shut up completely.

Now, imagine if it wasn’t just a court of law as in the arrest scenario, but that anybody that could see anything you had ever said. Future employers, dates, law enforcement… not just in your own country or state, but also for every place you’ll ever visit in the future with different laws. Also, imagine that this holds true for the rest of your life, with the laws undergoing change in the next 60 years or whatever number of years you have left, and imagine what you say today is going to be repainted in the light of 60 years from now. (There was nothing said in 1941 which was common knowledge and social glue then, but which would be terribly embarrassing and a complete block-out if found today, was there?)

It would become practically impossible to say… anything remotely challenging. At least if you wanted a future. You may still talk about the weather.

True, there are some limits to who can see what you say today. There is a “share with friends” limit. But it is getting recorded, all of it, and it has your name to it. Down the line, this may become public. Or it may not. Maybe it only becomes available to future employers. The thing is, there is no way to know.

There is no shortage of people who, for instance, react to news of greedy bankers with a blurt-out along the lines of “Bonus!? The only thing this guy deserves is a bullet between the eyes“. This is social glue, and not a literal death threat. So imagine if all of those statements resulted in arrests a few hours later, or was held against the person saying it in the next job interview. That’s where we’re heading if we’re crippling anonymity.

The only way to protect ourselves and free speech is to safeguard the anonymity we enjoy today in the streets when we say something, and the fact that that statement disappears as soon as it is said. As speech moves online, that anonymity must remain, when the transiency doesn’t and everything we say becomes part of a permanent record.

You've read the whole article. Why not subscribe to the RSS flow using your favorite reader, or even have articles delivered by mail?

About The Author: Rick Falkvinge

Rick is the founder of the first Pirate Party and is a political evangelist, traveling around Europe and the world to talk and write about ideas of a sensible information policy. He has a tech entrepreneur background and loves whisky.

Liked This?

By participating in the discussion and posting here, you are placing your contribution in the public domain (CC0). If you are quoting somebody else, credit them.

Contributors take own responsibility for their comments.

25

  1. Falkvinge on Infopolicy: “Everything You Say Can And Will Be Used Against You, By Anybody, Now Or Decades … http://tinyurl.com/447peeh

  2. 2
    steelneck

    You are on to something really important, but it needs to be rephrased and, sort of, purified into a clean argument that preemts some misunderstandings. I think those misunderstandings between public, private and anononymity will show allready in the comments to this blogpost.

  3. 3

    I wrote a bit about the conflict between public and private information in Swedish WBW: http://www.webhackande.se/privat_kontra_publikt

  4. 4
    Jixtreme

    This is especially troubling since my one of my most favorite hobbies is trolling people on the internet.

  5. 5

    Intimidating us into self-censorship is the actual goal – self-censorship is much more efficient than censorship. Don’t let that happen – proudly stand by your faults and past mistakes !

  6. 6
    booyah

    On one hand, these politicians are fighting to kill online anonymity.

    On the other hand, the want “the right to be forgotten” as a matter of privacy.

    Basically, anything you do online has your name on it, but then you can request with force of law that the stupid things you said are permanently censored.

    • 6.1

      The invented “right to be forgotten” is indeed a matter of privacy, but one of one’s own memory. Nobody has the right to go in and erase it.

      There is no such thing as a right to be forgotten, as it requires tampering with the memory of other human beings. The notion is horrifying.

      • 6.1.1
        booyah

        Absolutely agreed.

        I’m merely pointing out that *they themselves* are creating the problem by abolishing online anonymity and then they present their asinine “right to be forgotten” as the cure.

        It’s doubly horrifying, and I really have to ask myself whether they’re nefariously devious or mind-numbingly stupid.

  7. 7
    Ninja (@icanhazsake)

    It can backlash against the supporters of greater censorship. Their data will be there too. It can be used against these same politicians that are supporting today.

  8. 8

    In Sweden, there is a law that you have to have permission to store personal data about people in digital form. There should be like that, You should need a special permission to store anything personal (comments and so on) for a longer period than a few weeks.

  9. RT @piratbloggar: Falkvinge on Infopolicy: “Everything You Say Can And Will Be Used Against You, By Anybody, Now Or Decades … http://tinyurl.com/447peeh

  10. 9
    Elias.L

    We are all fucked, no seriously im NOT even joking.

  11. 10
     

    You state the “there are politicians trying to eliminate anonymity on the net” though I don’t see where that is? I’m aware that it’s being brought up in reports on evading censorship and so on, and I’m certain its curtailment is being tabled as a possibility, but I don’t see anonymity being actively engaged against yet.

    Some current examples of where they’re trying to eliminate anonymity?

    • 10.1

      Maybe you are not aware of the huge current controversy over the Google+ and Facebook demands for “wallet names,” the high-profile cases of selling your data to third parties without even checking if they are legitimate, the pushing of such requirements for track-across-the-nets purposes with the lame “reason” that “it’s purely for marketing purposes” or that this is the third such push in the last 15 years, the previous being the REAL ID legislation that was rejected by all 50 states.

      Or perhaps you cannot imagine how many diverse threads weave together into a fabric (and no, not tin-foil; simple similarity/congruency comparisons).

      • 10.1.1
         

        Most of those have nothing to do with politicians, government or law.

        REAL ID is the only government-led issue you mention, but then that – as far as I’m aware – had nothing to do with “trying to eliminate anonymity on the net” at all. Then you say it was completely rejected anyway?

        So I will ask again: Where are there current examples of politicians trying to eliminate anonymity? Maybe there are examples I’m not aware of, maybe there are not, but without any substantiating evidence either way am I to just believe that it is true because Rick says so?

        Is this part of the “social glue” game where someone asserts something, and irrational, unthinking, emotionally-driven peons knee-jerk react accordingly?

  12. RT @piratbloggar: Falkvinge on Infopolicy: “Everything You Say Can And Will Be Used Against You, By Anybody, Now Or Decades … http://tinyurl.com/447peeh

  13. 11
    Irony

    Yet, the irony is you require a name and email to comment on the article about the importance of being able to say things anonymously

  14. 12
    Mike

    It doesn’t help when you go to make a comment, it always says name (required)….then it says to put your email addy down with the cute little promise in parentheses that says (will not be published)….does anybody really believe that? So, I’m commenting on a blog about anonymity, of all things , but in order to comment I have to give a name? Hmmmm, yeah…do I sound convinced? Not only am I not convinced, I aint fooled either……and my name isn’t Mike, either.

    • 12.1
      Tom

      Hi “Mike”,

      Your real word “name” that your parents committed to paper, that is used by friends, family and government paper pushers alike isn’t really your “name” (the way you are identified and cataloged) on the net.

      Your i.p.#, plus the collection of profiling data, are how you are identified on the net, and unless:

      1) you used i.p. address scrambling technology to come to this webpage

      2) you gave yourself a unique personna that can’t be captured by data mining software

      the webmaster of this site has your “name” and “address”

  15. 13

    I’ve never said anything I was embarressed about, I’m very opinionated, and believe in getting my message out to society, because I always believe I’m right. Some may disagree with that, but that makes interesting conversation. I’ve never declared any violence in society, but believe we have to cancel some laws passed by the traitors we’ve elected to run our nation. Click on my name and see the task I’ve assigned mysellf to reach in 2012. I will take on some of the problems of laws that have cancelled our Bill of Rights, but we must do this in the Ballot box.

  16. [...] addition, they can record, index, and store all of this indefinitely, to come back at you decades after the fact and question your character when the political context has changed [...]

  17. […] naked, but that anything everybody says and thinks is recorded – and that it can and will be used against them, decades from now, when laws and values have […]

Add a Comment

7 + 6 =   

On Facebook

Popular Articles

Adobe the leech - original photo by OakleyOriginals on Flickr
158

Swarm Economy – Zacqary Adam Xeper

Swarm Economy – Zacqary Adam Xeper

Money cut into pieces - Photo by Flickr user Tax Credits
71

Swarm Economy – Zacqary Adam Xeper

Swarm Economy – Zacqary Adam Xeper

European Parliament
70

Pirate Parties

Pirate Parties

Librep July 12 frame
31

Civil Liberties

Civil Liberties

colorblindflag
21

United States – Zacqary Adam Xeper

United States – Zacqary Adam Xeper

solarroad
15

Swarm Economy – Zacqary Adam Xeper

Swarm Economy – Zacqary Adam Xeper

peter_sunde_0237
11

Swarm Economy – Lionel Dricot

Swarm Economy – Lionel Dricot

More in Freedom of Speech

"God Hates Signs" next to "God Hates Fags" protesters
8

Freedom of Speech – Zacqary Adam Xeper

Freedom of Speech – Zacqary Adam Xeper

Valve mechanism
92

Freedom of Speech

Freedom of Speech

Dandelion seed
16

Freedom of Speech – Christian Engström

Freedom of Speech – Christian Engström

Gagged Person, CC-BY-SA, ashleyrosex at Flickr
16

Freedom of Speech – Andrew Lee

Freedom of Speech – Andrew Lee

Group of college students studying at campus
26

Freedom of Speech – Piotr Czerski

Freedom of Speech – Piotr Czerski

Other Recent Headlines

Burned book
34

Civil Liberties – Henrik Alexandersson

Civil Liberties – Henrik Alexandersson

NSA Seal Holding the Heartbleed Logo
40

Infrastructure – Zacqary Adam Xeper

Infrastructure – Zacqary Adam Xeper

PPEU founding in European Parliament, March 21, 2014.
17

Pirate Parties

Pirate Parties

Bitcoin concept by Antanacoins. CC-By-SA, Flickr.
42

Cryptocurrency – Charlie Shrem

Cryptocurrency – Charlie Shrem

About The Author

Rick is the founder of the first Pirate Party and is a political evangelist, traveling around Europe and the world to talk and write about ideas of a sensible information policy. He has a tech entrepreneur background and loves whisky.

More On Infopolicy

Bottles of Snake Oil - Photo by Jagrap on Flickr
29

Copyright Monopoly – Zacqary Adam Xeper

Copyright Monopoly – Zacqary Adam Xeper

facebook
12

Swarm Economy – Zacqary Adam Xeper

Swarm Economy – Zacqary Adam Xeper

523377_63619557
4

Infopolicy – Henrik Brändén

Infopolicy – Henrik Brändén

photo_10071_20090418-646x363
71

Copyright Monopoly – David Collier-Brown

Copyright Monopoly – David Collier-Brown

National_Security_Agency_headquarters,_Fort_Meade,_Maryland_public_domain_image
149

Infopolicy – Christian Engström

Infopolicy – Christian Engström

Many different currencies - CC photo by epSos.de
45

Diversity – Zacqary Adam Xeper

Diversity – Zacqary Adam Xeper

le_tresor_rackham_le_rouge_1280x1024
11

Copyright Monopoly – Lionel Dricot

Copyright Monopoly – Lionel Dricot

Books before copyright
99

Copyright Monopoly – Johnny Olsson

Copyright Monopoly – Johnny Olsson

Collaborative whiteboard at OuiShare 2012, full of wonderful ideas for venture capitalists to ruin - photo by Natalie Ortiz
14

Swarm Economy – Zacqary Adam Xeper

Swarm Economy – Zacqary Adam Xeper

Border Patrol In Montana
25

Activism – Travis McCrea

Activism – Travis McCrea

Spices - Marrakech 09 Souks
58

Swarm Economy

Swarm Economy

Screen Shot 2013-06-27 at 7.23.12 PM
33

Copyright Monopoly – Travis McCrea

Copyright Monopoly – Travis McCrea

An Ouya console and controller
15

Infopolicy – Zacqary Adam Xeper

Infopolicy – Zacqary Adam Xeper

Smári McCarthy
36

Privacy – Christian Engström

Privacy – Christian Engström

1984-ish poster from London's Public Transport
8

Privacy – Loz Kaye

Privacy – Loz Kaye

Man slamming his head on a desk in frustration - CC photo by Flickr user mbshane
36

Privacy – Zacqary Adam Xeper

Privacy – Zacqary Adam Xeper

This publication is protected under the Constitution of the Kingdom of Sweden. Any problem you have with this publication remains exclusively yours. Accountable publisher: Rick Falkvinge.
All text on this site is Public Domain / CC0 unless specifically noted and credited otherwise. Copy, remix, and inspire. (Troll policy.)
Log in | Original theme design by Gabfire themes (heavily modified)