• Flattr FoI: 
Falkvinge &Co. on Infopolicy
BEFORE-FALKVINGE-IF-ANY FALKVINGE &CO. ON
INFOPOLICY
Falkvinge on Infopolicy - Home
»
Buskers - CC image by blueroy on Flickr

Artists: We’re Not Salespeople, We’re Street Performers

14

Reflections – Zacqary Adam Xeper

Reflections – Zacqary Adam Xeper

My fellow artists, we need to talk. We’re all starving, our fans are starving, and life just sucks for all of us. The only way we’re going to make a living as entertainers is to sit back, cool our jets, and take a reality check. We are, and always have been, buskers.

I know it doesn’t seem like we’re on a street corner, guitar case propped open, ready to accept money from passers-by. We’re on the Internet. We’re selling albums, and movies, and games, and books, and all sorts of products. Right? And when people download our stuff without paying us, that’s theft. Of our products. Which we’re selling in our stores.

Except that’s a lie. We’ve had holes poked in the argument that we’re selling things, or that making a copy is theft, but it was a lie even before everything went digital. Even when our songs, our films, our novels, our software only came on physical media, we were never salespeople. We were never manufacturers. Those vinyl discs and hardback books were nice collectables, sure, but they were never more than packaging. Without the music, the story, the experience inside, who would want to buy those random knick-knacks we sold?

No, it’s never been about selling. Or pushing a product. The big distributors and publishers sure made us think that it was, but come on, artists. We’ve always known it was about the art.

We never stopped busking, guys.

I’m on a street corner playing my guitar, singing my heart out, and some jackass freeloader walks on by without even throwing a coin in my guitar case. What a scumbag! “Get back here, you ungrateful pirate!” I shout. “Stop, you thief!” And then the police come running, and look at me like I’m crazy.

That’s what we’re doing when we get mad at people who pirate our work. Except the police don’t always think we’re crazy. Maybe they ought to.

It sucks when someone enjoys your work and can’t help you put food on your table, I know. A lot of the time they’d like to help and just can’t afford it. But I’ve had people flat-out tell me, “That was great, but I don’t think I’ll be donating,” and of course it stings a little bit. You know what, though? That’s life. Wait for the ones who will pay.

And you know, maybe it sucks too that we don’t get to think of what we do as selling a product. Maybe it’d be easier if we weren’t glorified buskers. But I say it’s easier to embrace that. Do we really want it to be our job to sell products and move units? Hell no! We’re artists, man! Our job is to move people, to make people laugh, cry, and feel things they’ve never felt before. Our job is to connect with people. And the more people you connect with, the more likely it is that one of them can spare some cash for you.

I don’t know about you, but I never wanted to be a salesman anyway.

You've read the whole article. Why not subscribe to the RSS flow using your favorite reader, or even have articles delivered by mail?

About The Author: Zacqary Adam Xeper

Zacqary is an activist in the New York Pirate Party, where his official title is "Cat Herder." He is an open source game developer, and the Chief Executive Plankhead of Plankhead, a free culture arts collective. Despite believing that money is a superfluous social construct, he has a Gittip profile.

Liked This?

By participating in the discussion and posting here, you are placing your contribution in the public domain (CC0). If you are quoting somebody else, credit them.

Contributors take own responsibility for their comments.

14

  1. 2

    I know this isn’t the right place for an ad for what my company is doing, but the whole point to Safe-Xchange is to help musicians do exactly what this article is about. We’re about to start a crowd funding campaign to pay the cost of getting our app ready to distribute. If this resonates for you at all, take a look at our site (safe-xchange.com) and watch for us at IndieGoGo.

    I’m going to post a link to this on Facebook and G+. Zacquary has it exactly right.

  2. 3
    Caleb Lanik

    I’ve never entirely gotten why artists feel like they have a right to massive amounts of money. I mean, they’re basically demanding the right to get paid, and paid incredibly well in the case of the more popular artists, for their hobby. I mean, I like to program, but it’s a hobby. People shouldn’t feel like it’s both morally and legally required that they pay me for my hobby so I don’t have to get a real job. If I can find a company who wants to pay me to do it, that’s great, but why is it anyone else’s responsibility? I don’t know, maybe I’ve got things all wrong, but when artists tell me how important it is that people pay them for their hobby, and that if I don’t they’ll stop making art, well, screw those artists, I guess.

    • 3.1

      This is the type of animosity we need to do away with. Attitudes of who has the right to money, or the obligation to pay, is what leads to the kind of contempt I illustrated in my last piece.

      Artists feel like they have a right to be paid, and pirates feel like they don’t have an obligation to pay, because none of us want to starve to death. And unfortunately, we live in a society that requires people to have “real jobs,” whatever those are, to be granted the privilege to eat food. So in our desperation, we start getting indignant at one another.

      Everybody needs to move beyond this righteous indignation at each other. We’ve got a lot of people in the world who think it’s valuable for artists to be able to devote their full time to their craft, but it’s not going to work if we’re all thinking of each other like greedy profiteers or freeloaders.

      From a purely pragmatic perspective, I think the first step towards getting over this indignation is for artists to change how we think about ourselves, which will put us in the right frame of mind to change our marketing strategy to one that doesn’t piss people off so much.

    • 3.2
      JadeStar

      (I realize it’s way faux pas to post a reply so many months late, but it’s not like the topic itself has gone stale.)

      Caleb, what reasons have you for making the giant leap to equate “art” with “hobby” ?
      Also, what gives a person the “right” to find a “company” to pay you, but not the “right” to independently garner and audience and paying customers?

      Self-managed artists are no more hobbyists than self-employed programmers are.

      Both deserve respect for their work, and both deserve to be compensated, though I’ve never heard anyone make the argument that either should be compensated a particular amount, a particular way, or according to a particular model.

      The point of this article seems to be connecting with artists in particular, reminding each other not to forget that simply having an effect on the audience is a very satisfying type of compensation itself.

      An incredibly similar argument can be made for open-source code development:

      Do it for love and quit complaining about money — money will certainly follow the amazing work produced from a labor of love.

  3. 4
    Clocky

    So basically what you are saying is that all musicians are the same and doesn’t deserve to make money on a regular basis?
    You say that you dont want to be a salesman and most musicians probably wont either but those who want to sell their music and manages it well are the most succesfull. Doesn’t that ring a bell to you?
    B§y the way comparing nonpaying people walking past busking musicians with those nonpaying pirates who download exactly the music they want and really enjoy is not a valid comparison.

    • 4.1

      1. Every human being deserves to live a comfortable life, live healthily, and do what makes them happy.
      2. Not every capitalist endeavor deserves to make money.

      We can all agree with both of those, but they contradicting each other. Everyone deserves food, health, and safety. Nobody automatically deserves money. But food, health, and safety cost money.

      It looks like we’re at an impasse here.

      That’s why I say we break out of this vicious cycle of looking at music as a business transaction. We’re only going to keep arguing about who deserves what, and never fix anything.

      How about this? Let’s pretend money doesn’t exist. Let’s pretend laws don’t exist. Now, let’s figure out how to make sure everyone can survive and devote their lives to whatever they want, whether that’s making music, building model airplanes, or curing cancer. How do we do that?

  4. 5
    Crazygolem

    Artists are not salesmen, so they hire actual salesmen to do the job (actually it’s the other way around, but the result is the same, isn’t it?)

    So you have actual salesmen, record labels and majors, who are screwing everyone around, artists, fans and casual listeners alike, because artists did not want to be salesmen in the first place.

    Maybe if artists were a little bit more willing to be salesmen, the situation would not have been so messed up ? Actually no, because then we would have been in the exact situation you are describing.

    The whole debate about who is or want to be a salesman misses its target. The actual question should be: Do artists only want to produce something that is sellable (by whoever wants to sell it), or do they want something else?

  5. 6
    gurra

    There is frankly no need to “sell” anything. The music itself is ads / PR for the service to produce new. (Illegal) file sharing is just hobby marketing creating a demand for the service of creating new work. What may have a value is the new work and not paying for copies of old achievements.

  6. 7
    Valtteri Kokkoniemi

    There’s no need to craft more or less unfitting analogies. Business model that’s based on restricting the freedom of others is unjustifiable and that should be sufficient cause for rejecting it. Tangible goods are different because they are scarce, which information is not. Market economy is the best way to allocate scarce resources that we have yet come up with, but it’s not applicable to goods that are not scarce, without first artificially making them such. Which is exacly what copyright does.

    It’s also frivolous to claim that there could be no professional artists without copyright. Even if it were true, it would not justify copyright, but that’s an unnecessary argument because it’s obviously false, as people are clearly willing to pay for performances. Copyright is not needed to restrict access to a place like music club or stadium – that’s the standard domain of property rights. Without copyright, music would therefore be created to attain fame, which is requisite for selling tickets to performances. Best of all, this business model is ethically sound and proven to work. It also allows superstars to be rich, as they can do gigs to stadium-sized crowds…which is probably what we all consider reasonable :)

  7. […] is what I mean when I argue that artists are all street performers, and that creative industries are already donor-supported. Under the surface, the seed of a culture […]

Add a Comment

× 7 = 49  

On Facebook

Popular Articles

Adobe the leech - original photo by OakleyOriginals on Flickr
160

Swarm Economy – Zacqary Adam Xeper

Swarm Economy – Zacqary Adam Xeper

Money cut into pieces - Photo by Flickr user Tax Credits
71

Swarm Economy – Zacqary Adam Xeper

Swarm Economy – Zacqary Adam Xeper

Librep July 12 frame
31

Civil Liberties

Civil Liberties

colorblindflag
22

United States – Zacqary Adam Xeper

United States – Zacqary Adam Xeper

peter_sunde_0237
11

Swarm Economy – Lionel Dricot

Swarm Economy – Lionel Dricot

More in Reflections

House by the sea - CC Photo by Flickr user archer10
16

Reflections – Zacqary Adam Xeper

Reflections – Zacqary Adam Xeper

original vs. copy
9

Reflections – Josef Ohlsson Collentine

Reflections – Josef Ohlsson Collentine

The Moscow Triumphal Gate lit up witih rainbow lights - CC photo from Wikimedia Commons
20

Reflections – Zacqary Adam Xeper

Reflections – Zacqary Adam Xeper

file0001685183687
28

Reflections

Reflections

Beggar - CC photo by Flickr user jmennens
13

Reflections – Zacqary Adam Xeper

Reflections – Zacqary Adam Xeper

Taboo game cards - CC photo by Flickr user Geekyteacher
28

Reflections – Zacqary Adam Xeper

Reflections – Zacqary Adam Xeper

Gento Penguins on Falklands/Malvinas Islands. Photo by chrispearson72 at FlickR
16

Argentina – Juan Manuel Santos

Argentina – Juan Manuel Santos

Vague concept of code
21

Reflections

Reflections

Other Recent Headlines

solarroad
15

Swarm Economy – Zacqary Adam Xeper

Swarm Economy – Zacqary Adam Xeper

European Parliament
70

Pirate Parties

Pirate Parties

Burned book
35

Civil Liberties – Henrik Alexandersson

Civil Liberties – Henrik Alexandersson

NSA Seal Holding the Heartbleed Logo
40

Infrastructure – Zacqary Adam Xeper

Infrastructure – Zacqary Adam Xeper

PPEU founding in European Parliament, March 21, 2014.
17

Pirate Parties

Pirate Parties

About The Author

Zacqary is an activist in the New York Pirate Party, where his official title is "Cat Herder." He is an open source game developer, and the Chief Executive Plankhead of Plankhead, a free culture arts collective. Despite believing that money is a superfluous social construct, he has a Gittip profile.

More On Infopolicy

Bitcoin concept by Antanacoins. CC-By-SA, Flickr.
42

Cryptocurrency – Charlie Shrem

Cryptocurrency – Charlie Shrem

Bottles of Snake Oil - Photo by Jagrap on Flickr
29

Copyright Monopoly – Zacqary Adam Xeper

Copyright Monopoly – Zacqary Adam Xeper

facebook
12

Swarm Economy – Zacqary Adam Xeper

Swarm Economy – Zacqary Adam Xeper

523377_63619557
4

Infopolicy – Henrik Brändén

Infopolicy – Henrik Brändén

photo_10071_20090418-646x363
71

Copyright Monopoly – David Collier-Brown

Copyright Monopoly – David Collier-Brown

National_Security_Agency_headquarters,_Fort_Meade,_Maryland_public_domain_image
149

Infopolicy – Christian Engström

Infopolicy – Christian Engström

"God Hates Signs" next to "God Hates Fags" protesters
8

Freedom of Speech – Zacqary Adam Xeper

Freedom of Speech – Zacqary Adam Xeper

Many different currencies - CC photo by epSos.de
45

Diversity – Zacqary Adam Xeper

Diversity – Zacqary Adam Xeper

le_tresor_rackham_le_rouge_1280x1024
11

Copyright Monopoly – Lionel Dricot

Copyright Monopoly – Lionel Dricot

Valve mechanism
92

Freedom of Speech

Freedom of Speech

Books before copyright
99

Copyright Monopoly – Johnny Olsson

Copyright Monopoly – Johnny Olsson

Collaborative whiteboard at OuiShare 2012, full of wonderful ideas for venture capitalists to ruin - photo by Natalie Ortiz
14

Swarm Economy – Zacqary Adam Xeper

Swarm Economy – Zacqary Adam Xeper

Border Patrol In Montana
25

Activism – Travis McCrea

Activism – Travis McCrea

Spices - Marrakech 09 Souks
58

Swarm Economy

Swarm Economy

Screen Shot 2013-06-27 at 7.23.12 PM
33

Copyright Monopoly – Travis McCrea

Copyright Monopoly – Travis McCrea

An Ouya console and controller
15

Infopolicy – Zacqary Adam Xeper

Infopolicy – Zacqary Adam Xeper

Smári McCarthy
36

Privacy – Christian Engström

Privacy – Christian Engström

This publication is protected under the Constitution of the Kingdom of Sweden. Any problem you have with this publication remains exclusively yours. Accountable publisher: Rick Falkvinge.
All text on this site is Public Domain / CC0 unless specifically noted and credited otherwise. Copy, remix, and inspire. (Troll policy.)
Log in | Original theme design by Gabfire themes (heavily modified)