• Flattr FoI: 
Falkvinge &Co. on Infopolicy
BEFORE-FALKVINGE-IF-ANY FALKVINGE &CO. ON
INFOPOLICY
Falkvinge on Infopolicy - Home
»
Hands in prayer

Creators Of Public-Domain Bible Threatened With Lawsuit By Other Bible’s Copyright Monopoly Holders

20

Copyright Monopoly

Copyright Monopoly

Religion is big business. The Christian Bible, like any other book, is under copyright monopoly – or, to be precise, any translation of it younger than 100 years or so is under copyright monopoly, and people quoting extensively from the Christian Bible bring in big licensing money to the copyright monopoly holders. Activists decided this was not in tune with the religion and decided to create a free alternative, only to be met with a threat of lawsuit.

A couple of free culture/knowledge activists in Sweden decided to retranslate the Christian Bible into modern-day language, using old out-of-copyright-monopoly sources, and send their final work right into the public domain. The name of the project was “Free Bible” (fribibel).

A laudable goal, for sure, regardless of whether you agree with religion as such. The project had been repeatedly torpedoed by the monopoly holders of the predominant bible translation, using statements saying how the project “wasn’t necessary” as everybody was able to quote from their bible.

Well, yes, but only because the law specifically says the monopoly holders are not allowed to prevent that. Also, somebody saying “we give you permission to do X today, so you don’t need to create a free alternative” gives me a very bitter aftertaste. A project like this is about removing the mere ability for somebody else to grant or deny such permission in the first place, and not about getting permission for a day.

The license terms for quoting from the copyright-monopoly bibles changed pretty much overnight as project Free Bible was announced – from having extensive license fees for every reprinting beyond a very short amount, no matter the context, to requiring license fees for commercial use only. (Not that it changes the rationale for a public domain version, but it highlights the power of breaking monopolies.)

It gets considerably worse, though. Last week, the copyright monopoly holders sent a legal nastygram threatening a lawsuit to the translators of the Free Bible if they didn’t update a blog page (!) to reflect the new licensing terms of the current monopoly holders (!!). The blog page in question was the rationale for the project Free Bible, and described why a public-domain version was necessary by highlighting the license requirements for usage of the book today.

To add insult to injury, this nastygram had pretty much no legal weight whatsoever. The page was accurate when written, and in Sweden, you can’t slander or libel an organization – only an individual – so the nastygram is doubly inaccurate, and underscores the need for a public domain version of the work in question.

Some Christians definitely don’t do unto others as they expect others to do unto them. In this aspect, the perennial entitlement of copyright monopoly holders, no matter where they are found, seems to be the defining factor.

You've read the whole article. Why not subscribe to the RSS flow using your favorite reader, or even have articles delivered by mail?

About The Author: Rick Falkvinge

Rick is the founder of the first Pirate Party and is a political evangelist, traveling around Europe and the world to talk and write about ideas of a sensible information policy. He has a tech entrepreneur background and loves whisky.

Liked This?

By participating in the discussion and posting here, you are placing your contribution in the public domain (CC0). If you are quoting somebody else, credit them.

Contributors take own responsibility for their comments.

20

  1. 1

    I doubt that the writers of the nastygram are true Christians themselves, but lawyers that the holders have on board. The bible warns about being “unequally yoked” which I take to mean don’t get into a partnership with someone who does not share your moral standards.
    Crap like this is the reason I started http://christiansagainstcopyright.org
    If you believe that your message is of utmost importance to humanity and want everyone to hear it then it’s crazy to lock up that message, or any other materials that help spread it, under copyright.

    • 1.2

      I’m a christian and I don’t agree with using any copyright at all because yes, you should be paid your due for your labour, but you should not have to receive your payment by living at the expense of everyone else who labours.
      What copyright really does, is that it gives a subsidy to the first labourer/artist, at the expense of greatly increasing the costs of all other labourers/artists that come after (in the form of royalties).

      Sell your labour to create new works if you want to. Heck, sell copy reproduction of your existing works if you want to. But don’t sell it in a way that restricts others from selling copy reproduction if they want to, because that is no longer your labour. It is wrong to steal from these other labourers (in the form of fines or jailtime) for serving their fellow man or community at their own expense, using their own property and labour.
      https://torrentfreak.com/why-do-copyright-monopolists-think-they-can-just-take-somebody-elses-work-130203/

      that’s why i would have taken it one step further with your site christians against copyright, but otherwise i agree with everything you said.

    • 1.3
      SomeRandomDude

      “No true Scotsman”…

      • 1.4.1
        Pragmatic

        Nice appeal to authority you’ve got there, blah-browser-crash and SomeRandomDude. However, it only holds up if choosing to self-identify as one or being associated with nominal Christian activities is sufficient to meet the criteria required to be a Christian. By that logic, I could claim to be Napoleon simply because I choose to self-identify as him with no proof required of me and you would be obliged to accept it.

        Try again.

  2. 2
    Anonymous

    it makes no difference what the subject is, when there is money at stake and someone can see there is even a remote chance that they may be missing out on some or they may be entitled to some, then this issue over patents and copyright is going to get ever increasingly worse! i am not against patents or copyright, but there has to be clear rules and terms. at the moment, these terms are ridiculously and unnecessarily long and unclear. 10 years is more than enough, providing the original filer is alive. also at the moment, there are so many ways of interpreting the same thing, no one knows which is right and which is bullshit. the whole lot of these were first brought in to progress ‘the sciences and arts’. now, they are used for anything and everything except the original meaning, mostly to get money for as long as possible but also to stop the ordinary people from benefiting and to stop ‘the sciences and arts’ from being progressed by others.

  3. 3

    The World English Bible is public domain and I haven’t heard of anyone trying to stop it. I wonder whay fribibel is being attacked.

    Paul

  4. [...] Rick Falkvinge skriver om vår turbulens utifrån sitt perspektiv. Han intresserar sig mycket för Copyright-frågor och var med och bildade Piratpartiet. Artikeln är på engelska och går att läsa på hans hemsida. [...]

  5. 4

    When I was volunteering with Project Gutenberg back in the 1990s I thought that it would be neat to have some notable works by Christian authors available free online, and I figured that it would be good advertising too. I didn’t want their whole catalog, just a few examples. I figured anyone with even the smallest degree of Christian belief would be delighted at the chance to spread their message.

    The authors in question had been deceased some years, but I wrote letters to four or five estates. Not one of them was interested. _Not one_.

    Maybe someone needs to throw the moneychangers out of the temple….

  6. 5
    revdjenk

    … And there is another copyright problem especially for digital Bible users… That is, if you purchase a version of the Bible, it is normally NOT transferable between Bible programs. For example, neither of the Bible programs I use on my laptop are available on my android tablet. So my favorite version would have to be purchased again! (No, KJV is not my favorite, and yes, it too was ‘copyright protected’ King James saw to that!

  7. 6
    dmol8

    This new pope sounds like someone who would be interested in dealing with this problem: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pope_Francis

    Try reaching this guy and maybe getting his help with the copyright problem in general.

  8. 7
    Zacqary Adam Green

    I would like to point out that Jesus was a filthy copyright thief who illegally counterfeited bread and fish, depriving bakers and fishermen of their hard-earned revenue.

  9. 8
    Anonymous

    The members of Svenska Bibelsällskapets should refamiliarize themselves with 1 Corinthians 6:1-8.

  10. 9
    Morten

    They should sue them for legal bullying or something. It’s not as if the intention of copyright laws was to rid the world of bullies.

  11. 10

    Any bible version should only be copyrighted to protect anybody changing it.
    For example if you publish the New International Version it should retain the original
    wording of the NIV. However, the NIV copyright holders should not restrict publishing of the NIV by others. Leave a donation request if desired but do NOT restrict the spreading of the gospel.

    God’s law – which states that the Gospel should be spread – supercedes man’s laws that restricts the gospel from being preached (or published).

    NIV and all other bible versions are you listening?

  12. […] Creators Of Public-Domain Bible Threatened With Lawsuit By Other Bible’s Copyright Monopoly Holder… […]

Add a Comment

9 − 6 =   

On Facebook

Popular Articles

PyramidCapital
24

Diversity – Zacqary Adam Xeper

Diversity – Zacqary Adam Xeper

Bitcoin concept
13

Cryptocurrency – Nozomi Hayase

Cryptocurrency – Nozomi Hayase

More in Copyright Monopoly

Bottles of Snake Oil - Photo by Jagrap on Flickr
29

Copyright Monopoly – Zacqary Adam Xeper

Copyright Monopoly – Zacqary Adam Xeper

photo_10071_20090418-646x363
71

Copyright Monopoly – David Collier-Brown

Copyright Monopoly – David Collier-Brown

le_tresor_rackham_le_rouge_1280x1024
11

Copyright Monopoly – Lionel Dricot

Copyright Monopoly – Lionel Dricot

Books before copyright
99

Copyright Monopoly – Johnny Olsson

Copyright Monopoly – Johnny Olsson

Other Recent Headlines

Screenshot from Librep-2014-08-10-take1.mp4
8

Civil Liberties

Civil Liberties

Librep July 12 frame
32

Civil Liberties

Civil Liberties

Money cut into pieces - Photo by Flickr user Tax Credits
78

Swarm Economy – Zacqary Adam Xeper

Swarm Economy – Zacqary Adam Xeper

colorblindflag
22

United States – Zacqary Adam Xeper

United States – Zacqary Adam Xeper

Adobe the leech - original photo by OakleyOriginals on Flickr
168

Swarm Economy – Zacqary Adam Xeper

Swarm Economy – Zacqary Adam Xeper

peter_sunde_0237
13

Swarm Economy – Lionel Dricot

Swarm Economy – Lionel Dricot

solarroad
16

Swarm Economy – Zacqary Adam Xeper

Swarm Economy – Zacqary Adam Xeper

European Parliament
70

Pirate Parties

Pirate Parties

About The Author

Rick is the founder of the first Pirate Party and is a political evangelist, traveling around Europe and the world to talk and write about ideas of a sensible information policy. He has a tech entrepreneur background and loves whisky.

More On Infopolicy

NSA Seal Holding the Heartbleed Logo
40

Infrastructure – Zacqary Adam Xeper

Infrastructure – Zacqary Adam Xeper

Bitcoin concept by Antanacoins. CC-By-SA, Flickr.
42

Cryptocurrency – Charlie Shrem

Cryptocurrency – Charlie Shrem

facebook
12

Swarm Economy – Zacqary Adam Xeper

Swarm Economy – Zacqary Adam Xeper

523377_63619557
4

Infopolicy – Henrik Brändén

Infopolicy – Henrik Brändén

National_Security_Agency_headquarters,_Fort_Meade,_Maryland_public_domain_image
154

Infopolicy – Christian Engström

Infopolicy – Christian Engström

"God Hates Signs" next to "God Hates Fags" protesters
8

Freedom of Speech – Zacqary Adam Xeper

Freedom of Speech – Zacqary Adam Xeper

Many different currencies - CC photo by epSos.de
45

Diversity – Zacqary Adam Xeper

Diversity – Zacqary Adam Xeper

Valve mechanism
95

Freedom of Speech

Freedom of Speech

Collaborative whiteboard at OuiShare 2012, full of wonderful ideas for venture capitalists to ruin - photo by Natalie Ortiz
15

Swarm Economy – Zacqary Adam Xeper

Swarm Economy – Zacqary Adam Xeper

Border Patrol In Montana
25

Activism – Travis McCrea

Activism – Travis McCrea

Spices - Marrakech 09 Souks
58

Swarm Economy

Swarm Economy

Screen Shot 2013-06-27 at 7.23.12 PM
33

Copyright Monopoly – Travis McCrea

Copyright Monopoly – Travis McCrea

An Ouya console and controller
15

Infopolicy – Zacqary Adam Xeper

Infopolicy – Zacqary Adam Xeper

Smári McCarthy
36

Privacy – Christian Engström

Privacy – Christian Engström

1984-ish poster from London's Public Transport
8

Privacy – Loz Kaye

Privacy – Loz Kaye

Man slamming his head on a desk in frustration - CC photo by Flickr user mbshane
36

Privacy – Zacqary Adam Xeper

Privacy – Zacqary Adam Xeper

This publication is protected under the Constitution of the Kingdom of Sweden. Any problem you have with this publication remains exclusively yours. Accountable publisher: Rick Falkvinge.
All text on this site is Public Domain / CC0 unless specifically noted and credited otherwise. Copy, remix, and inspire. (Troll policy.)
Log in | Original theme design by Gabfire themes (heavily modified)