• Flattr FoI: 
Falkvinge &Co. on Infopolicy
BEFORE-FALKVINGE-IF-ANY FALKVINGE &CO. ON
INFOPOLICY
Falkvinge on Infopolicy - Home
»
Digitized rejection sign

ACTA Moves To First Europarliament Committee: Rejection Proposed

10

Civil Liberties

Civil Liberties

As the ACTA treaty moves through the European Parliament for a final passage or permakill, it passes through several committees on its way to the final vote in Parliament, which possibly happens on June 11-14. The first committee to file a recommendation, the Industry, Research and Energy committee (ITRE), has just published their draft opinion on ACTA. This draft will be presented in committee on April 24, and come to a vote on May 8 (probably). The draft opinion of ITRE is very clear: reject ACTA.

The draft opinion of the ITRE committee, which is exemplary in its clarity (it’s just one page!), lists a couple of justification points followed by the recommendation to reject ACTA:

The draft opinion, in full, reads that the ITRE committee…:

  • Welcomes the aims expressed by the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA) negotiating parties to tackle the trade in counterfeited goods;
  • Notes that counterfeiting, copyright and trademark infringements are covered by ACTA thus creating a one-size-fits-all instrument of enforcement which doesn’t meet the unique needs of each sector; is concerned by the lack of definition of key terminologies on which the ACTA enforcement mechanisms are based; fears that this creates legal uncertainty for European companies and in particular [small-to-medium businesses], technology users, online platform and internet service providers;
  • Notes that while the ambition of ACTA is to strengthen [European Union] industries, it appears to be contrary to the ambition of the [European Parliament] in the Digital Agenda to make Europe the scene for cutting edge internet innovation, as well as the strong ambition to promote net neutrality and access to the online digital market for [small-to-medium businesses];
  • Recalls that data concerning the scale of IPR infringements are inconsistent, incomplete, insufficient and dispersed, and that an objective, independent impact assessment is needed for any additional legislative proposal;
  • Is concerned that the ACTA text does not ensure a fair balance between the right to intellectual property and the freedom to conduct business, the right to protection of personal data and the freedom to receive or impart information, the requirement of which was recently ruled by the European Court of Justice;
  • Therefore, feels compelled to call on the Committee on International Trade to withhold its consent to the agreement.

Short, sweet, and beautiful. “…withhold its consent to the agreement”. (My highlight.)

This draft opinion will be presented to the ITRE committee and discussed on April 24, and the rapporteur (the Member of European Parliament responsible for the drafting of an opinion and presenting the issue in committee) is Amelia Andersdotter (@teirdes on Twitter). After that, it will probably but not definitely come to a vote on May 8 (updated).

That name will probably sound familiar to readers of this blog. Ms. Andersdotter is a Member of European Parliament for the Swedish Pirate Party.

UPDATED: The article originally said that the ITRE vote was going to be on April 24; it’s the rapporteur that will present the issue and the draft opinion on that date. After that, a process follows where other members can suggest changes to the draft opinion, and then it all comes to a vote, probably on May 8. Thanks for the clarification, Teirdes.

UPDATE 2: It should be pointed out exactly what this document is: it is –

  • the rapporteur’s draft for
  • ITRE’s recommendation to INTA for
  • INTA’s recommendation to European Parliament for
  • the Parliament’s final decision on whether to accept or permakill ACTA.

INTA (the committee on international trade) will receive recommendations (“opinions“) from several more committees – probably at least that of Legal Affairs (JURI) and that of Civil Liberties (LIBE) – before writing its own recommendation to Parliament based on those and their own opinion. So while this document is plankton in the food chain, it’s still the right kind of plankton.

You've read the whole article. Why not subscribe to the RSS flow using your favorite reader, or even have articles delivered by mail?

About The Author: Rick Falkvinge

Rick is the founder of the first Pirate Party and is a political evangelist, traveling around Europe and the world to talk and write about ideas of a sensible information policy. He has a tech entrepreneur background and loves whisky.

Liked This?

TRANSLATIONS AVAILABLE
This article is also available in other languages: Hungarian.

By participating in the discussion and posting here, you are placing your contribution in the public domain (CC0). If you are quoting somebody else, credit them.

Contributors take own responsibility for their comments.

10

  1. 1
    Anonymous0514

    http://avaaz.org/en/acta_time_to_win/

    Please, Europe… Sign this to Stop ACTA.

    • 1.1
      Anonymous

      The petition calls for sending ACTA to the European Court of Justice (Europe’s highest court) for evaluation, something that will take years. This is not in our interest to do if we have the ability to move in for a political kill, which is why the European Parliament is currently acting for a swift decision (my interpretation).

  2. [...] Research and Energy committee (ITRE), has just published their draft opinion on ACTA,” writes Pirate Party founder Rick Falkvinge this [...]

  3. 2
    TT

    Is there a place where all the MEPs oppinion on Acta is listed so its easy to see whom is for and whom is agains?

    Easier just to send mails to those who are for acta. :)

  4. 3
    Björn Persson

    “To withhold its consent” sounds more like a deferral than a rejection to me, but if that’s bureaucratese for “say no” then fine.

  5. 4
    ANNM

    How likely is it that this draft will pass ITRE without being amended to the point that it says the total opposite of what it does now?

  6. [...] Research and Energy committee (ITRE), has just published their draft opinion on ACTA,” writes Pirate Party founder Rick Falkvinge this morning. Crucially, the final point in the ITRE’s [...]

  7. [...] Industry, Research and Energy committee (ITRE), has just published their draft opinion on ACTA,” writes Pirate Party founder Rick Falkvinge this [...]

Add a Comment

1 × 4 =   

On Facebook

More in Civil Liberties

tsa
7

Activism – Travis McCrea

Activism – Travis McCrea

email security
24

Activism – Andrew "K`Tetch" Norton

Activism – Andrew "K`Tetch" Norton

European Commission building
15

Transparency – Christian Engström

Transparency – Christian Engström

Hand holding key against sky
15

Transparency – Christian Engström

Transparency – Christian Engström

policeriot
4

Civil Liberties – Travis McCrea

Civil Liberties – Travis McCrea

Accountability
7

Activism – Andrew "K`Tetch" Norton

Activism – Andrew "K`Tetch" Norton

Other Recent Headlines

Chris Dodd is not amused
10

Pirate Parties – Zacqary Adam Green

Pirate Parties – Zacqary Adam Green

Dandelion seed
11

Freedom of Speech – Christian Engström

Freedom of Speech – Christian Engström

Buskers - CC image by blueroy on Flickr
11

Reflections – Zacqary Adam Green

Reflections – Zacqary Adam Green

About The Author

Rick is the founder of the first Pirate Party and is a political evangelist, traveling around Europe and the world to talk and write about ideas of a sensible information policy. He has a tech entrepreneur background and loves whisky.

More On Infopolicy

Beggar - CC photo by Flickr user jmennens
9

Reflections – Zacqary Adam Green

Reflections – Zacqary Adam Green

Taboo game cards - CC photo by Flickr user Geekyteacher
10

Reflections – Zacqary Adam Green

Reflections – Zacqary Adam Green

Gento Penguins on Falklands/Malvinas Islands. Photo by chrispearson72 at FlickR
16

Argentina – Juan Manuel Santos

Argentina – Juan Manuel Santos

Pen and ink
19

Infopolicy – Lionel Dricot

Infopolicy – Lionel Dricot

"Monopoly" board game, dice in foreground
15

Patent Monopolies – Christian Engström

Patent Monopolies – Christian Engström

Vague concept of code
20

Reflections

Reflections

LHC's ATLAS detector, with Alpha Geek | Copyright Maximilien Brice, CERN
9

Activism – Andrew "K`Tetch" Norton

Activism – Andrew "K`Tetch" Norton

Dr. Evil doing that thing he does with his pinky finger
44

Lobby Efforts – Zacqary Adam Green

Lobby Efforts – Zacqary Adam Green

Private Property sign on a tree
6

Copyright Monopoly – Christian Engström

Copyright Monopoly – Christian Engström

3D printer making some kind of…turtle? I guess?
15

Activism – Zacqary Adam Green

Activism – Zacqary Adam Green

J.S. Bach, BWV 605, Der Tag, der ist so freudenreich. (score)
25

Copyright Monopoly – Karl Fogel

Copyright Monopoly – Karl Fogel

Reading room at the New York Public Library
90

Infopolicy – Zacqary Adam Green

Infopolicy – Zacqary Adam Green

Trying, unsuccessfully, to reinvent the cuddly toy business model
25

Copyright Monopoly – Jack Zeal

Copyright Monopoly – Jack Zeal

A musical group busking in a public square
23

Copyright Monopoly – Zacqary Adam Green

Copyright Monopoly – Zacqary Adam Green

Fences on a lawn, private residence in background, signifying dividers and privacy.
6

Privacy – Henrik Alexandersson

Privacy – Henrik Alexandersson

Handprint
13

Argentina – Juan Manuel Santos

Argentina – Juan Manuel Santos

perpetual.ipr
3

Copyright Monopoly – Wendy Cockcroft

Copyright Monopoly – Wendy Cockcroft

This publication is protected under the Constitution of the Kingdom of Sweden. Any problem you have with this publication remains exclusively yours. Accountable publisher: Rick Falkvinge.
All text on this site is Public Domain / CC0 unless specifically noted and credited otherwise. Copy, remix, and inspire. (Troll policy.)
Log in | Original theme design by Gabfire themes (heavily modified)