Tintin And The Copyright Sharks

Tintin, the well-known cartoon adventurous reporter, is something that the creator Hergé wanted to die with him. In this guest piece, Lionel Dricot explains how a British man managed to crush Hergé’s legacy and turn the whole thing into profitable exploitation that is purely hostile to all things artistry, intending to never let the cartoon fall into the public domain, not even in 2053.

In Belgium, Tintin is an icon. Something that the whole country is proud of. Beers, chocolates and Tintin are the symbols of that small European country.

Tintin was created by the cartoonist Hergé, who died in 1983 while working on the 24th album of Tintin, which was never finished and was only published as an incomplete story in 2004.

Before dying, Hergé explicitly stated that nobody should continue Tintin. He wanted his young reporter to die with him and, so far, his will has been respected. Old albums are regularly reprinted and most Belgians have read the 22 albums of the series at least once (the very first one, Tintin and the Soviets, is actually a pretty odd anti-communist propaganda from the 20s and Hergé didn’t want to republish it). Unlike other cartoon characters, Tintin is not evolving any more but the richness of the 22 albums, with their parade of magnificent characters, is considered a sacred work by the so-called Tintinophiles.

All of that didn’t prevent a very lucrative business to happen: derivatives, cookies and even a movie directed by Steven Spielberg himself. Each time a picture of Tintin is used somewhere in the world, the company Moulinsart (previously called Tintin Licensing, which is more explicit) earns a bunch of royalties. And guess what? They are pretty expensive.

The company even built a 15,000,000€ museum, called the Musée Hergé, which was built in the city of Louvain-la-Neuve on the location of the local youth club which has to be destroyed. During the inauguration, none of the journalists were allowed to take any picture to prevent “copyright abuse due to the work exposed”. Disgruntled, some journalists left the museum, which is very ironic when you know that Tintin is a reporter and a symbol of adventurous journalism. Today, the museum is mainly visited by international tourists and quite unpopular among the locals.

But what is this Moulinsart company that makes so much money? Who is becoming insanely rich thanks to the exploitation of Tintin? The answer is: a British man called Nick Rodwell. What was his contribution to Tintin? Essentially, he married Hergé’s widow. Yes, that’s all. He managed to transfer all the rights of Tintin to the company he founded with his wife and is now just trying to crush every use of Tintin where he doesn’t get enough royalties. Regularly, typical small Belgian snacks that use a picture of Tintin on their front window (because it’s a Belgian icon after all) are sued or shut down. Needless to say, Nick Rodwell is quite unpopular amongst Tintinophiles.

True fans wait for 2053. 70 years after Hergé’s dead, Tintin will become public domain. The symbol will become available to anyone.


In a recent interview, Nick Rodwell announced that Moulinsart would do anything they could to prevent Tintin to become public domain after 2053. To “protect” it. And they have an idea: another Belgian cartoon icon in Belgium, Spirou, has always been owned by a company (Dupuis) and, as such, cannot become public domain as long as the company produces new related work. Nick Rodwell plans to do exactly the same by releasing a new album… in 2051! Despite Hergé’s will, they plan to “protect the work”. They still have no idea about the story.

Maybe we could help them. “Tintin and the Copyright Sharks” sounds like an appealing story. A story that could illustrate how copyright is protecting “the artists”, those who work so hard to entertain us.

PS: Ironically, today (October 24, 2013) it was announced in the Belgian news that due to its impopularity, the Museum Hergé is currently an economic failure. Although the Museum is entirely private (and any benefit would go to the Moulinsart company), Nick Rodwell asked for financial help from the government.


  1. Pieter

    Tintin and the Soviets is actually from 1921, and was published serially in the childrens’ section of a Belgian newspaper (“le petit XXme”).

  2. Alias

    It should be noted that, as of November 2012, photos were still not allowed within Musée Hergé.

    French-speakers can also read a very interesting, albeit more legal/technical article on the blog S.I.Lex: “Pas de domaine public pour Tintin ? Mille millions de mille sabords de tonnerre de Brest !

  3. Maëlig

    Spirou that you bring up is actually a great example of a well-managed licence. Dupuis didn’t try to gun down the parodic album Pirates ! http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pirates_! and it launched an interesting series of one-shots for which it invites individual authors to have their own take on the character http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Le_Spirou_de… (FR).
    We need less of Tintin, more of Spirou. 🙂

    1. TCelin

      What is this “parodic album Pirates”?.. is this available somewhere?

      1. Maëlig

        The wikipedia link appears broken. The album is hard to find nowadays, you’d have to look for it in second-hands shops or online. It’s written by Mikaëlof and Sergueï and published by Ma Pomme.

      2. Maëlig

        Also this is fairly common practice in Franco-Belgian comics, one of my favourite example is Donjon Pirate http://donjonpirate.canalblog.com/ (again in FR).

  4. Googla

    “And guess what? They are pretty expensive.”
    Expensive? how do you know that? Their licensing fees are probably in the same region as Disney charges. And there are plenty of both Disney and Moulinsart licensed products on the market at varying prices.

  5. Anonymous

    and i’ll bet anything you like, the government will be only too pleased to help! just as they always do with arse holes! it’s like, helping like!

    helping any member of the ordinary public, where that help would be valued and respected, is the no no, usually because there are no kick-backs!!

  6. Techanon

    Wait, 70 years!? Belgium has the same copyright law than the US or am I missing something here?

  7. Ninja

    No worries. We, the pirates, will make sure it remains available to the public.

  8. acheter 3ds xl

    I am delighted that I arrived upon this website, I could not learn any info on this subject matter prior to checking out your publish. Many thanks God I arrived across on this weblog and identified the related details.

  9. […] qualité, disponibilité, flexibilité et respect des droits du client). Ils s'offusquent de l'utilisation insensée qui est faite du copyright et des non-sens qui en résultent. Ils s'indignent qu'on puisse imposer une taxe qui redistribuera […]

Comments are closed.