• Flattr FoI: 
Falkvinge &Co. on Infopolicy
BEFORE-FALKVINGE-IF-ANY FALKVINGE &CO. ON
INFOPOLICY
Falkvinge on Infopolicy - Home
»
Photo of people wearing Anonymous masks in a way that doesn't actually cover their faces. I'm definitely not in this photograph. Not at all. I swear.

Anonymous: From /b/ In-Joke to Sociopolitical Philosophy?

4

Activism – Zacqary Adam Xeper

Activism – Zacqary Adam Xeper

Anonymous has always been growing, changing, and redefining itself. Some suggest it may now be expanding beyond hacktivism and identity-hiding, and into an ideology. Perhaps, one can be Anonymous without being literally anonymous.

For a while, I’d been noticing a trend in the way people who call themselves Anonymous seemed to think and act. Several days ago, this post on Pastebin summed it up quite nicely for me:

Anonymous is not a group. Many of us form groups, but Anonymous is not about groups.
Anonymous is not a hacker collective. Many of us hack, but Anonymous is not about hacking.
Anonymous does not live on the Internet. Many of us meet and communicate online, but Anonymous is not just about the Internet.

Anonymous is a movement. An idea. A meme. Over years and years, it has grown and matured: beginning like an immature child, pulling pranks and causing chaos with no rhyme or reason; then becoming a formidable activist movement, devoted to the freedom of information and anti-censorship.

And lately, as global society begins to collapse, with the legitimacy of our leaders and institutions eroding every day, Anonymous is growing once more, its purpose becoming clearer and further realized.

Many Anons hide our identities, but Anonymous is not about hiding. We hide our names and our faces because they are irrelevant. [Emphasis mine]

Names are a distraction from the words we say, and the actions we take. They are, at best, a nuisance, and at worst, a serious danger to human thinking. This is why Anonymous does not support politicians. We do not support parties. We do not support named ideologies. We do not support cults, be they cults of dogma or of personality.

We don’t want to know your name. We don’t want to know if you are a liberal, a conservative, a capitalist, a communist, a socialist, a fascist, an anarchist, a green, or whatever. All we care about is whether we like the things that you say, and the things that you do.

So from time to time, some of us may remove our masks, or let our identities slip. But we will still be Anonymous. For we have surrendered our egos, and ignore the egos of others.

We are Anonymous, people who have freed our minds from the tyranny of names.

One could argue, isn’t Anonymous just another name? To which we say: it is the anti-name. The name to end all names.

There’s a host of anecdotes suggesting that many self-described Anons are beginning to view Anonymous as a ideological movement. “You can’t arrest an idea” was the response to FBI threats against LulzSec; LulzSec, of course, being one of many Anonymous-affiliated groups — perhaps comparable to Greenpeace’s affiliation with the green movement, or PETA’s to the animal rights movement. The popular new forum What Is The Plan flies the banner of Anonymous for adamantly hacking-unrelated purposes, reinforcing the notion that Anonymous has a mission beyond its most infamous methods. And, of course, the vast support and turnout of Anonymous at Occupy Wall Street, a social change action only tangentially related to the Internet or technology.

It’s that last one which really makes the Pastebin manifesto resonate; Occupy Wall Street is almost an exact manifestation of what it describes. Vocal support for politicians of any party or political stripe is nearly absent. Arguments that the occupation should focus on “abolishing capitalism” or “let’s have socialism/anarchism in America” fail to gain widespread support. Celebrities such as Roseanne Barr, Michael Moore, Cornel West, and others inspire the movement with their appearances, but do not become the faces, voices, or leaders of it. Instead, the gears are turned by no-name, average people discussing specific, concrete issues and solutions.

Few of these average people make much of an effort to hide their identities, but they don’t play them up either; they speak with their words, not with their names. This is partially because of the limitations of physical versus online communication: voices can’t easily be obscured, and masks can be uncomfortable after prolonged use or get you arrested in New York City.

But online, many Anons do end up being decidedly onymous: from pseudonyms in IRC channels, forums, and Twitter accounts, to the names of groups like LulzSec and C@b!nCr3w. The fact that most don’t (willingly) reveal their “real” names is hardly the point; when all’s said and done, which specific Anon or Anonymous-affiliated group took an action is often an incidental curiosity. For example, how many articles about Anonymous’ leak of NYPD officer Anthony Bologna’s personal info even bother to mention that it was done by the aforementioned C@b!nCr3w?

These bits and pieces — one Anon’s musings on Pastebin, the ramifications of pseudonyms and named groups within Anonymous, and the Anonymous-influenced Occupy Wall Street — are all, admittedly, just that: bits and pieces. They’re not rock-solid proof of a cohesive and clear definition of the Anonymous movement, or the driving ideas behind it. But Anonymous has never been particularly clear, cohesive, or rock-solid. It’s nearly impossible to accurately define what it is at any particular moment in time, so it may be positively Sisyphean to forecast what it may be morphing into next.

However, the notion of Anonymous as an ego-blind destroyer of weasel words, jargon, charlatanry, and bullshit in general is intriguing. It’s hard to argue that this world needs less cult-of-personality and dogma, and more individuals thinking for themselves. If Anonymous stands for a society in which people focus less on the egos of politicians, businessmen, and experts, and more on the ideas they communicate — regardless of which school of thought they come from — then hell, I’d gladly call myself Anonymous.

You've read the whole article. Why not subscribe to the RSS flow using your favorite reader, or even have articles delivered by mail?

About The Author: Zacqary Adam Xeper

Zacqary is an activist in the New York Pirate Party, where his official title is "Cat Herder." He is an open source game developer, and the Chief Executive Plankhead of Plankhead, a free culture arts collective. Despite believing that money is a superfluous social construct, he has a Gittip profile.

Liked This?

TRANSLATIONS AVAILABLE
This article is also available in other languages: Hungarian.

By participating in the discussion and posting here, you are placing your contribution in the public domain (CC0). If you are quoting somebody else, credit them.

Contributors take own responsibility for their comments.

4

  1. 1
    pop

    The human race has always been trying to self-organise. Just like trillions of similar cells are cooperating to create the human body, groups of humans are discovering ways they can cooperate to become something bigger. You could say it’s a complex system, where the whole is greater than the sum of its parts. We are born this way — we are social animals by nature, relatively intelligent ones too.

    Indeed, there have been countless attempts throughout recorded history and before it where humans created civilisations, and for the sake of this analogy we would postulate that political systems are the DNA that holds those civilisations together. Alas, some civilisations are born diseased, which causes them to fail, while others are born looking healthy, but their genes make them prone to corruption/cancer, which eventually causes them to fail (and thus the phoenix rises once more from the ashes).

    It’s quite clear by now that whatever political system is running the western world today is not destined to work and will fall like all those before it. Whatever that political system was it mutated and, for lack of a better term, degenerated into medieval guildery — western civilisation has been hijacked by corporate tribalism (call it whatever you like). I can’t tell how long this giant will take to fall to his knees — it could well be after our deaths. Perhaps he won’t fall at all, but will heal himself and keep walking, I don’t know.

    I consider Anonymous to be something new, perhaps the beginning of another such attempt that is growing into an ideology and ultimately a political system. Maybe it’s the cure the giant needs, who knows? Anyway, I would be naive if I didn’t attribute this phenomenon (in part or in whole) to the internet, possibly the most disruptive invention in thousands of years. I couldn’t attest to how good a political system Anonymous could become, but some instinctive part of me says it would’t be worse than what we have today (but whoever comes to control the internet is who controls the world, and there’s the phoenix rising again).

    To understand what ideals Anonymous embodies I try to look at its history. The name comes from 4chan’s “Anonymous” comment-posting feature, that’s quite obvious. The story behind what it means is, I believe, rather more complex. I invite you to read this article by the guardian, which reports on a keynote speech by Christopher Poole, the founder of 4chan:

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2011/mar/13/christopher-poole-4chan-sxsw-keynote-speech

    That may give some insight on these ideas, but I believe we can look even further. 4chan itself is a copy of 2chan, a hugely popular Japanese message board, whose founder also echoed similar thoughts:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2channel#Anonymous_posting

    If one reads about Japanese society, it will quickly become apparent that their social ways are quite different from ours. They have a very explicit social hierarchy that is observed without question; in our eyes it looks almost militaristic, but it permeates everyday life to ridiculous levels. Not to say that an analogue doesn’t exist in our society, but it’s largely implicit and harder to find or counter.

    Anonymity rejects the very notion of social standing, just like the Anonymous member said above, and one is judged merely on his opinions and behaviour. In fact, I would be quite confident in saying Anonymous really seems like an *anti-movement* to hierarchical political and societal organisation, and is in essence a new and potent permutation of civil libertarianism.

    In all honesty, I find it absolutely fascinating. I’m also afraid of it.

  2. 2
    steelneck

    @pop: About the corporate tribalism, recently i listened on a lecture by Hans Rosling, Epidemiology for the bottom billion (four parts on youtube). He said something very good about corporations when he talked about patents and medicine:

    “I always regarded the corporate sector to be like the horse on the old farm, it was the force of the horse that brought food on the table. My grandpa tought me to be very polite to the horse, never talk bad about the family horse, to pet it and we did not eat the horse, it was sacred. But one thing they never did with the horse, they never asked the horse for advice. That is how we should deal with the corporate sector.”/Hans Rosling

  3. 3
    Ninja (@icanhazsake)

    IT’ll take a few years for the Govt (including NYPD) to realize what you just wrote. I call myself a pirate. I do what I can to support the ones at the front lines. But maybe again I’m just another one in the group of Anonymous. Dark times we face now. But times that are interesting and bustling with activity towards the light.

Add a Comment

+ 4 = 10  

On Facebook

Popular Articles

US Capitol Buildings
21

Quality Legislation – Nozomi Hayase

Quality Legislation – Nozomi Hayase

More in Activism

threwitontheground
19

Activism – Travis McCrea

Activism – Travis McCrea

Broken dictionary - CC photo by Flickr user eliajphilips
19

Activism – Zacqary Adam Xeper

Activism – Zacqary Adam Xeper

cheerse
11

Activism – Travis McCrea

Activism – Travis McCrea

paypalevil
20

Activism – Travis McCrea

Activism – Travis McCrea

Border Patrol In Montana
25

Activism – Travis McCrea

Activism – Travis McCrea

tsa
18

Activism – Travis McCrea

Activism – Travis McCrea

Other Recent Headlines

Bitcoin concept
13

Cryptocurrency – Nozomi Hayase

Cryptocurrency – Nozomi Hayase

PyramidCapital
26

Diversity – Zacqary Adam Xeper

Diversity – Zacqary Adam Xeper

Screenshot from Librep-2014-08-10-take1.mp4
9

Civil Liberties

Civil Liberties

Librep July 12 frame
32

Civil Liberties

Civil Liberties

Money cut into pieces - Photo by Flickr user Tax Credits
78

Swarm Economy – Zacqary Adam Xeper

Swarm Economy – Zacqary Adam Xeper

colorblindflag
22

United States – Zacqary Adam Xeper

United States – Zacqary Adam Xeper

Adobe the leech - original photo by OakleyOriginals on Flickr
170

Swarm Economy – Zacqary Adam Xeper

Swarm Economy – Zacqary Adam Xeper

peter_sunde_0237
13

Swarm Economy – Lionel Dricot

Swarm Economy – Lionel Dricot

solarroad
16

Swarm Economy – Zacqary Adam Xeper

Swarm Economy – Zacqary Adam Xeper

European Parliament
71

Pirate Parties

Pirate Parties

About The Author

Zacqary is an activist in the New York Pirate Party, where his official title is "Cat Herder." He is an open source game developer, and the Chief Executive Plankhead of Plankhead, a free culture arts collective. Despite believing that money is a superfluous social construct, he has a Gittip profile.

More On Infopolicy

NSA Seal Holding the Heartbleed Logo
40

Infrastructure – Zacqary Adam Xeper

Infrastructure – Zacqary Adam Xeper

Bitcoin concept by Antanacoins. CC-By-SA, Flickr.
42

Cryptocurrency – Charlie Shrem

Cryptocurrency – Charlie Shrem

Bottles of Snake Oil - Photo by Jagrap on Flickr
29

Copyright Monopoly – Zacqary Adam Xeper

Copyright Monopoly – Zacqary Adam Xeper

facebook
12

Swarm Economy – Zacqary Adam Xeper

Swarm Economy – Zacqary Adam Xeper

523377_63619557
4

Infopolicy – Henrik Brändén

Infopolicy – Henrik Brändén

photo_10071_20090418-646x363
71

Copyright Monopoly – David Collier-Brown

Copyright Monopoly – David Collier-Brown

National_Security_Agency_headquarters,_Fort_Meade,_Maryland_public_domain_image
155

Infopolicy – Christian Engström

Infopolicy – Christian Engström

"God Hates Signs" next to "God Hates Fags" protesters
8

Freedom of Speech – Zacqary Adam Xeper

Freedom of Speech – Zacqary Adam Xeper

Many different currencies - CC photo by epSos.de
45

Diversity – Zacqary Adam Xeper

Diversity – Zacqary Adam Xeper

le_tresor_rackham_le_rouge_1280x1024
11

Copyright Monopoly – Lionel Dricot

Copyright Monopoly – Lionel Dricot

Valve mechanism
96

Freedom of Speech

Freedom of Speech

Books before copyright
99

Copyright Monopoly – Johnny Olsson

Copyright Monopoly – Johnny Olsson

Collaborative whiteboard at OuiShare 2012, full of wonderful ideas for venture capitalists to ruin - photo by Natalie Ortiz
15

Swarm Economy – Zacqary Adam Xeper

Swarm Economy – Zacqary Adam Xeper

Spices - Marrakech 09 Souks
58

Swarm Economy

Swarm Economy

This publication is protected under the Constitution of the Kingdom of Sweden. Any problem you have with this publication remains exclusively yours. Accountable publisher: Rick Falkvinge.
All text on this site is Public Domain / CC0 unless specifically noted and credited otherwise. Copy, remix, and inspire. (Troll policy.)
Log in | Original theme design by Gabfire themes (heavily modified)